Development and Contributing¶
The development of python-for-android is managed by the Kivy team via Github.
Issues and pull requests are welcome via the integrated issue tracker.
Read on for more information about how we manage development and releases, but don’t worry about the details! Pull requests are welcome and we’ll deal with the rest.
python-for-android is developed using the following model:
masterbranch always represents the latest stable release.
developbranch is the most up to date with new contributions.
- Releases happen periodically, and consist of merging the current
For reference, this is based on a Git flow model, although we don’t follow this religiously.
python-for-android releases currently use calendar versioning. Release numbers are of the form YYYY.MM.DD. We aim to create a new release every four weeks, but more frequent releases are also possible.
We use calendar versioning because in practice, changes in python-for-android are often driven by updates or adjustments in the Android build tools. It’s usually best for users to be working from the latest release. We try to maintain backwards compatibility even while internals are changing.
Creating a new release¶
New releases follow these steps:
- Create a new branch
release-YYYY.MM.DDbased on the
git checkout -b release-YYYY.MM.DD develop
- Create a Github pull request to merge
- Complete all steps in the release checklist, and document this in the pull request (copy the checklist into the PR text)
At this point, wait for reviewer approval and conclude any discussion that arises. To complete the release:
- Merge the release branch to the
- Also merge the release branch to the
- Tag the release commit in
master, with tag
vYYYY.MM.DD. Include a short summary of the changes.
- Release distributions and PyPI upload should be handled by the CI.
- Add to the Github release page (see e.g. this example): - The python-for-android README summary - A short list of major changes in this release, if any - A changelog summarising merge commits since the last release - The release sdist and wheel(s)
- [ ] Check that the builds are passing - [ ] [Travis build](https://travis-ci.org/kivy/python-for-android) - [ ] [GitHub Action](https://github.com/kivy/python-for-android/actions) - [ ] Run the tests locally via `tox`: this performs some long-running tests that are skipped on Travis. - [ ] Build and run the [on_device_unit_tests](https://github.com/kivy/python-for-android/tree/master/testapps/on_device_unit_tests) app using buildozer. Check that they all pass. - [ ] Build (or download from github actions) and run the following [testapps](https://github.com/kivy/python-for-android/tree/master/testapps/on_device_unit_tests) for arch `armeabi-v7a` and `arm64-v8a`: - [ ] on_device_unit_tests - [ ] `armeabi-v7a` (`cd testapps/on_device_unit_tests && PYTHONPATH=.:../../ python3 setup.py apk --ndk-dir=<your-ndk-dir> --sdk-dir=<your-sdk-dir> --arch=armeabi-v7a --debug`) - [ ] `arm64-v8a` (`cd testapps/on_device_unit_tests && PYTHONPATH=.:../../ python3 setup.py apk --ndk-dir=<your-ndk-dir> --sdk-dir=<your-sdk-dir> --arch=arm64-v8a --debug`) - [ ] Check that the version number is correct
How python-for-android uses pip¶
Last update: July 2019
This section is meant to provide a quick summary how p4a (=python-for-android) uses pip and python packages in its build process. It is written for a python packagers point of view, not for regular end users or contributors, to assist with making pip developers and other packaging experts aware of p4a’s packaging needs.
Please note this section just attempts to neutrally list the current mechanisms, so some of this isn’t necessarily meant to stay but just how things work inside p4a in this very moment.
(This part repeats other parts of the docs, for the sake of making this a more independent read)
p4a builds & packages a python application for use on Android. It does this by providing a Java wrapper, and for graphical applications an SDL2-based wrapper which can be used with the kivy UI toolkit if desired (or alternatively just plain PySDL2). Any such python application will of course have further library dependencies to do its work.
p4a supports two types of package dependencies for a project:
Recipe: install script in custom p4a format. Can either install C/C++ or other things that cannot be pulled in via pip, or things that can be installed via pip but break on android by default. These are maintained primarily inside the p4a source tree by p4a contributors and interested folks.
Python package: any random pip python package can be directly installed if it doesn’t need adjustments to work for Android.
p4a will map any dependency to an internal recipe if present, and otherwise use pip to obtain it regularly from whatever external source.
Install process regarding packages¶
The install/build process of a p4a project, as triggered by the p4a apk command, roughly works as follows in regards to python packages:
The user has specified a project folder to install. This is either just a folder with python scripts and a main.py, or it may also have a pyproject.toml for a more standardized install.
Dependencies are collected: they can be either specified via
--requirementsas a list of names or pip-style URLs, or p4a can optionally scan them from a project folder via the pep517 library (if there is a pyproject.toml or setup.py).
The collected dependencies are mapped to p4a’s recipes if any are available for them, otherwise they’re kept around as external regular package references.
All the dependencies mapped to recipes are built via p4a’s internal mechanisms to build these recipes. (This may or may not indirectly use pip, depending on whether the recipe wraps a python package or not and uses pip to install or not.)
If the user has specified to install the project in standardized ways, then the setup.py/whatever build system of the project will be run. This happens with cross compilation set up (CC/CFLAGS/… set to use the proper toolchain) and a custom site-packages location. The actual comand is a simple pip install . in the project folder with some extra options: e.g. all dependencies that were already installed by recipes will be pinned with a -c constraints file to make sure pip won’t install them, and build isolation will be disabled via
--no-build-isolationso pip doesn’t reinstall recipe-packages on its own.
If the user has not specified to use standardized build approaches, p4a will simply install all the remaining dependencies that weren’t mapped to recipes directly and just plain copy in the user project without installing. Any setup.py or pyproject.toml of the user project will then be ignored in this step.
Google’s gradle is invoked to package it all up into an .apk.
Overall process / package relevant notes for p4a¶
Here are some common things worth knowing about python-for-android’s dealing with python packages:
- Packages will work fine without a recipe if they would also build on Linux ARM, don’t use any API not available in the NDK if they use native code, and don’t use any weird compiler flags the toolchain doesn’t like if they use native code. The package also needs to work with cross compilation.
- There is currently no easy way for a package to know it is being cross-compiled (at least that we know of) other than examining the CC compiler that was set, or that it is being cross-compiled for Android specifically. If that breaks a package it currently needs to be worked around with a recipe.
- If a package does not work, p4a developers will often create a recipe instead of getting upstream to fix it because p4a simply is too niche.
- Most packages without native code will just work out of the box. Many with native code tend not to, especially if complex, e.g. numpy.
- Anything mapped to a p4a recipe cannot be just reinstalled by pip, specifically also not inside build isolation as a dependency. (It may work if the patches of the recipe are just relevant to fix runtime issues.) Therefore as of now, the best way to deal with this limitation seems to be to keep build isolation always off.
Ideas for the future regarding packaging¶
- We in overall prefer to use the recipe mechanism less if we can. In overall the recipes are just a collection of workarounds. It may look quite hacky from the outside, since p4a version pins recipe-wrapped packages usually to make the patches reliably apply. This creates work for the recipes to be kept up-to-date, and obviously this approach doesn’t scale too well. However, it has ended up as a quite practical interims solution until better ways are found.
- Obviously, it would be nice if packages could know they are being cross-compiled, and for Android specifically. We aren’t currently aware of a good mechanism for that.
- If pip could actually run the recipes (instead of p4a wrapping pip and doing so) then this might even allow build isolation to work - but this might be too complex to get working. It might be more practical to just gradually reduce the reliance on recipes instead and make more packages work out of the box. This has been done e.g. with improvements to the cross-compile environment being set up automatically, and we’re open for any ideas on how to improve this.